此页面尚未翻译,当前以英语显示。查看原文

对比

Fibady vs Excel for a group's month-end close

更新于 二〇二六年九月四日作者:圣地亚哥·比利奥内

Excel is the most used FP&A tool in the world and it will stay on your team: for modelling, for one-off analysis, for whatever fits no system. Where it stops making sense is the recurring close of a group: export from each ERP, paste, reconcile, consolidate and redo when a late entry lands. That is what Fibady automates. This comparison is about that work, not about Excel in general.

Line-by-line comparison

Close task In Excel In Fibady
Loading ERP data Export and paste every month, per entity API or converter: minutes, and it remembers the format
Account classification VLOOKUPs over the chart; break when an account changes Mapping done once; new accounts are flagged
Multi-entity consolidation Master sheet linked to n workbooks; eliminations by hand Automatic, with semantic-role eliminations and visible "Consolidation adjustments"
Multi-currency Manual FX table, one method per sheet FX by month and currency; three currencies (accounting, reporting, display) in one click
P&L, balance sheet, cash flow Three sheets that must tie to each other Derived from one source and checked with invariants
Budget vs actual Another sheet, another structure, another paste Same P&L structure; automatic
Board report PowerPoint the night before AI-generated report with charts and commentary; you review and export to Word or PDF
Traceability "Where does this number come from?" → search n tabs Every figure opens to the ERP entry
Versioning close_v3_FINAL_ok.xlsx One source with history
Key-person dependency One person understands the master sheet Any user with permissions logs in and understands
Error risk High and silent: a badly dragged cell does not warn Control Centre: month-by-month checks with configurable tolerance
Scaling to more entities Each new entity multiplies the work Mapped and added to the consolidation
Ad-hoc analysis and modelling Excel wins: total flexibility Export to Excel and model there
Cost Licence ~$0, but ~25 h/month of skilled work $200 per entity per month, ~6 h/month of review

What does closing in Excel cost?

A three-entity group spending 25 hours a month on the close, at $35/h controller cost, spends about $10,500 a year building reports that expire the following month. With Fibady it pays $7,200 a year for the three entities and the close drops to about 6 hours: the net time saving exceeds the software cost from month one, and the work that remains is the work that adds value. Illustrative estimate; in the demo we calculate it with your hours.

When to stay in Excel

If you have one entity with a simple operation, if your books have no structured journal, or if your ERP is mid-migration. In those cases Fibady will not help you yet, and we will say so in the demo.

相关内容

常见问题

No. Fibady exports everything to Excel and many customers keep modelling there. What disappears is the monthly consolidation spreadsheet.

想用您自己的数据看看?

三十分钟内,我们连接您的企业资源计划系统或一份测试文件,您就能看到集团合并报表。无需安装,没有锁定。